[Игорь Лейко]

Vadikan
--------------
"Jill Zoeller [MS]" <???z@microsoft.com> сообщил в новостях следующее:
> The teams I worked on (Help/Getting Started) did not expose NTFS 5.0 in the
> finished documentation. In fact, I recall very clearly removing NTFS 5.0 and
> re-writing the text so that it showed "the version of NTFS available in
> Windows 2000." I can't speak for other sources, such as the SDK or articles
> in MSDN. I have no doubt you are correct that many sources still call it
> NTFS 5.0.
--------
We never exposed the NTFS version number in W2K (that I'm aware of), and our
published MS documentation (Help/Getting Started) didn't call it NTFS 5.0.
Instead, we used "The version of NTFS available in Windows 2000" or "The
version of NTFS available in Windows NT 4.0." However, it looks like 5.0 did
make an appearance in some MS KB articles, so obviously I can't claim that
nobody at MS ever called it 5.0
-----------
"Michael Obenshain [MS]" <???@microsoft.com> сообщил в новостях следующее:
> Actually this is correct, the version of NTFS in Windows XP is 3.1.
>
> The reason it was once called NTFS 5 is because they wanted the version to
> match the version of Windows, in this case the upgrade from Winnt4.0 was
> going to be Windows NT 5.0 until the name was changed to Windows 2000 so
> then the version of NTFS was changed to 3
----------
Ссылки давать бессмысленно. Сообщения были посланы в закрытые конференции, да и умерли уже эти конференции.